The agentic trading vendor map is changing fast enough that a procurement decision made on a marketing site is a decision made on out-of-date information. This brief produces the independent read.
Procurement decisions in this stack are routinely irreversible — once a multi-agent system is wired through a particular orchestrator or MCP server, switching costs compound monthly.
Independent diligence has to cover the framework's architectural assumptions, the vendor's commercial trajectory, the security posture, and the regulatory implications of the integration.
This brief produces a written dossier with a recommended action and the rationale to defend it.
Three methodology steps from the standing approach, scoped to this brief.
Frame
Read the regulator filings, the codebase, or the internal memo. Write the question that is actually being asked.
Build the artifact
The artifact named in Outputs, above. Working notes during the build are visible.
Hand it off
A meeting, not a link. Six weeks of follow-up Q&A is included.
This is not a paid endorsement or a vendor-funded analysis. Inclusion is not endorsement; depth is annotated.
This is not a contract review — see outside counsel for commercial-terms and IP review.
This does not include penetration testing or live security audit of the vendor's product.
Begin
Send the question.